What does a supervisory authority ask during an inspection of electronics?
Documents, technical substantiation and access to the product
A market surveillance authority conducting an inspection of electronics is essentially requesting three things: evidence that the product complies with the rules, access to the underlying technical information, and the ability to verify this itself. Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 empowers market surveillance authorities to request documentation and information from the manufacturer, importer or another market participant designated for that purpose. In practice, this typically concerns the product's technical documentation, the EU Declaration of Conformity, and data on the origin and distribution of the product in the supply chain. Once the digital product passport for a product category becomes mandatory, its content is also included here: a market surveillance authority can compare the data in the passport with the underlying documentation to verify that they match.
For manufacturers and importers, not automatically for the seller
This request for documentation is primarily directed at the manufacturer, and for products from outside the EU at the importer — they are the ones who must draw up and retain technical documentation in accordance with Article 27 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781). A retailer or distributor may be approached, but usually with a more limited request: can it be demonstrated who the manufacturer or importer is, and is a valid Declaration of Conformity present with the product. The obligation to reconstruct the underlying technical substantiation does not rest with the seller. This concerns the conformity of the product itself and the associated documentation — it is not about whether a warranty or consumer law dispute is justified, which is a different process with different rules.
No fixed date yet for electronics-specific requirements
For electronics and ICT equipment, it is not yet determined when product category-specific requirements from the ESPR — and with them the digital product passport — will actually take effect. The European Commission's work plan for 2025-2030 mentions delegated acts per sub-category, with an expectation that the first of these will be published from 2027 onwards. As long as such a delegated act does not exist, the existing CE marking rules and general market surveillance powers under Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 remain fully in force: a market surveillance authority can already request technical documentation and proof of conformity now, only without the additional passport obligation. Once the delegated act for a sub-category of electronics has been published, the date will be posted here.
What to do if the request actually comes
If a manufacturer or importer of electronics faces an inspection, it is practically wise to first establish what documentation already exists: the technical documentation, the EU Declaration of Conformity, and — if applicable — the information contained in a digital product passport. The second step is to verify that those documents correspond to the specific product model that the request concerns; market surveillance often focuses on a specific model or a particular batch, not the entire assortment. After that, it is important to know who within the organisation is authorised to respond on behalf of the manufacturer or importer, and within what time frame a response is expected — that deadline is specified in the letter or request from the market surveillance authority itself, and varies from case to case. Finally, it is advisable to retain what is requested and what is provided, so that your own file of the inspection is created.
Where this follows from: 2019/1020 and Article 27 ESPR
The authority of a market surveillance authority to request documentation and information, and to inspect products, is derived from Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 on market surveillance and product compliance. That regulation governs how market surveillance authorities throughout the EU act on products falling under harmonised EU legislation, and whom they may address for this purpose. The obligation for manufacturers to prepare, keep and provide technical documentation upon request is laid down in Article 27 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781). That article establishes the basic obligations of manufacturers; the specific requirements per product group — including electronics — follow only from the delegated acts that the Commission establishes per sub-category.
Anyone currently trading in electronics or ICT equipment should begin by putting existing technical documentation and declaration of conformity in order, so that it is demonstrably attributable to the correct product model at all times. For the question of when a digital product passport becomes mandatory for your own product category, the publication of the delegated act remains the source to follow — that date will be posted here as soon as it is known.
What this is based on
- Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 (market surveillance and product conformity)
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (ESPR), Article 27 (obligations of manufacturers)
The regulation itself is on EUR-Lex. We provide references per statement; you do not have to take our word for it.
What you must concretely do
What is expected of you
A check by the market surveillance authority hinges on one simple question: can you demonstrate that the product is what you say it is, and that the data behind it is correct? Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 gives the authority the powers to ask that question, and Article 27 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) sets out what information a manufacturer must keep available. For a company with 10 to 100 employees, this amounts to a number of concrete obligations.
Keep documentation available
The authority may request the technical documentation underlying the digital product passport: material composition, origin of components, test results, supplier declarations. This must not be scattered across colleagues' desks, with someone who happens to be on holiday, but must be kept in one place, with a name assigned to whoever manages it. For companies working with multiple product lines, it is often worthwhile to structure this properly once and for all rather than reinventing it for each line — see also how do I arrange the product passport for all my product lines at once.
Be able to explain the data
It is not enough to be able to hand over a file; you are also asked why a piece of data is correct and where it comes from. That means someone within the company must be able to answer the question "why is this percentage of recycled material stated here", not just refer to the supplier. This is one of the reasons why it makes sense to designate someone within the company who can explain this, and why how do I teach my employees to work with the product passport is more than a formality.
Cooperate with the investigation
Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 gives the authority the power to enter premises, request documents and take samples. The company is expected to cooperate: do not withhold documents, do not evade questions, and respond to requests within a reasonable timeframe. For a small company, this means above all that someone with decision-making authority must be reachable at the moment an inspection takes place, and not just the owner who happens to be away.
Take corrective measures
If it emerges that data is incorrect or the passport does not meet the requirements, the manufacturer is expected to take action: correct the data, update the passport, or in a more serious case remove the product from the market. This requires a process that already exists before the issue arises — not something invented on the spot.
Be able to demonstrate the passport in operation
An authority may ask you to scan the QR data carrier and see what a user sees. That means the passport must not only be correct in content, but must also work technically at the moment it is being checked. This is precisely why it makes sense to test in advance whether everything does what it should, see how can I test my product passport before it is published.
Where things go wrong in practice
The data is held by the supplier, not by the company itself. An importer relies on figures supplied by a factory abroad, but has no underlying evidence itself. When asked by the authority, no one in the company can explain where a figure comes from, only that "the supplier provided that".
Documentation is scattered across separate mailboxes. There is no central file, but a collection of emails, PDFs and Excel files held by different employees. When someone is on holiday or has left the company, the information is difficult to find within the timeframe given by the authority.
The passport refers to outdated data. A product modification was made at the factory, but the passport was not updated. The authority compares the physical product with the passport and sees a discrepancy, which raises questions that cannot be answered immediately.
No one is designated as responsible. During an inspection, the company is asked who within the business is responsible for the accuracy of the passport. If that question goes unanswered or everyone points to someone else, it creates the impression that there is no internal oversight.
The QR code no longer works or points to an expired page. Because hosting has been discontinued or a domain has expired, the data carrier no longer leads anywhere at the time it is checked.
What you can document
- An overview of where the technical documentation per product is stored, including who has access to it.
- Declarations from suppliers on material composition and origin, with date and version.
- An internal indication of who is responsible for the accuracy of the passport per product line.
- A log of changes to the product and the corresponding update of the passport.
- A test report demonstrating that the QR data carrier functioned correctly at a given time.
- Agreements on how quickly the company responds to a request from a supervisory authority, and who manages that process.
Anyone still having to build this typically does not start with the check itself, but with the question how do I approach the product passport for electronics step by step — from a fixed structure it is easier to be able to show at any time what is being requested.
This is not legal advice. This page provides general information about the regulations that this platform covers. We are not familiar with your situation. If you are in doubt about your own case, consult a lawyer or the competent supervisory authority.
Written with AI based on the sources above, checked by a human on 2026-08-22. Is something incorrect? Let us know — corrections take priority.