I sell private label electronics what are my obligations
You are considered a manufacturer for private label
Whoever places electronics on the market under their own brand or own name is designated as a manufacturer according to the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) — even if the product is actually assembled elsewhere. This is the crux of the matter: it is not who technically made the product that is decisive, but who puts the brand or name on the product and places it on the market that way. For private label electronics, this means that the full set of manufacturer obligations from Article 27 of the ESPR applies to you, including the obligations surrounding the digital product passport. The party that actually produces the product remains outside the scope of the law in that case, at least as far as manufacturer obligations are concerned.
Who this applies to, and who it does not
This applies to any undertaking that sells electronics or ICT equipment under its own brand, own name or own trademark, regardless of whether the design, manufacturing or assembly is carried out by a third party. It does not matter whether that third party is located inside or outside the EU — as soon as your own brand is on the product, the seller counts as a manufacturer. This does not apply to a party that resells a product unchanged under another's brand: that role falls under distributor or dealer, with a different and lighter set of obligations. The distinction between these two roles is therefore not the question "who made it", but the question "whose brand is on it". Anyone in doubt about which role their own situation falls under will find a more detailed assessment at Am I an importer or manufacturer according to the ESPR?. Whoever is sure that it is private label will read the obligations that come with it in more detail at I sell electronics under my own brand — what obligations do I get?.
The date is not yet fixed
When the obligation for a digital product passport for electronics and ICT equipment comes into force is not yet known. The ESPR works with a roadmap for the period 2025-2030 in which delegated acts are established per product category; for electronics and ICT this is expected from 2027 onwards. As soon as a delegated act for a specific sub-category is published, the actual entry into force date is also established — this information will be kept up to date on this platform as soon as it becomes available. Until then, nothing changes in the core rule: whoever sells under their own brand is and remains a manufacturer within the meaning of the ESPR, regardless of when the passport obligation for their own product category comes into force. Preparation can therefore begin now, even without a fixed date.
What this means in practice
The first step is to determine whether your own role is actually that of manufacturer, because everything else depends on it — this goes beyond just the brand name and also concerns who determines the design and who ultimately takes responsibility for conformity. Next, it is important to know who within your own chain is responsible for compiling and maintaining the product passport; this is detailed at Who is responsible for the product passport for electronics?. This is followed by the question of the data itself: for private label, technical information typically comes from the party that actually manufactures the product, while responsibility for the accuracy of that information remains with the brand owner. This directly affects the question of who signs for the conformity of the passport, and who is liable if an error is later found in it — both questions are addressed separately at who must sign that the product passport is correct and who is liable if there is an error in the product passport. Whoever purchases from a manufacturer outside the EU should arrange in advance how technical data will be provided and what role each party will have; see My manufacturer is outside the EU — who arranges the product passport then?In addition to the passport obligation, it is wise to keep related obligations on your radar: registration for waste electrical equipment and the availability of spare parts are separate processes that often come together with the passport obligation, and can be found at Do I need to register for waste electronics? and How long must I keep spare parts for electronics available?.
Where this follows from: Article 27 of the ESPR
The basis for the above is laid down in Article 27 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781), which sets out the obligations of manufacturers and also includes the circumstance that a party placing a product on the market under its own name or brand is treated as a manufacturer. That article provides the legal basis for classifying private label sellers as manufacturers, with all associated obligations regarding the digital product passport. The exact content and scope of those obligations per product category follow from the delegated acts that have yet to be published.
Any company currently selling private label electronics or planning to do so would be well advised to start by mapping out its own role and the data chain to the actual producer, so that no delay occurs once the delegated act for its own product category is published.
What this is based on
The regulation itself is on EUR-Lex. We provide references per statement; you do not have to take our word for it.
What you must concretely do
What is expected of you
Placing electronics on the market under its own brand, while another party actually develops and produces the product, is precisely the situation that the ESPR identifies as manufacturership. It is not the question of who designed or made the product that is decisive, but who puts its name or brand on it. Article 27 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) sets out the obligations of manufacturers, and those obligations therefore fall to the company carrying the private label, not to the party producing behind the scenes. Any company in doubt as to whether that applies to its own situation will find the basic reasoning at Am I an importer or manufacturer according to the ESPR?
Ensuring the product meets the requirements
Before the product comes on the market, there must be certainty that it complies with the requirements applicable to that product group under the ESPR. For a company of 10 to 100 employees, this usually means there is a supplier relationship with the party that actually makes the product, and that data, test results or statements from that party are received to serve as the basis for its own responsibility. Putting its own brand on a product without visibility into what the underlying manufacturer has tested or substantiated is a risk that does not remain with that underlying manufacturer, but with the brand owner.
Drawing up technical documentation and the product passport, or having it drawn up
The product passport and the underlying technical documentation must be in place, and the responsibility for this lies with the party identified as a manufacturer. In practice, this work can be outsourced or taken over from the underlying producer, but the responsibility that the content is correct and present does not shift with it. For companies that do not themselves have access to the technical data, this is often the point where a private label arrangement is most vulnerable: the data must come from elsewhere, and there must be a way to verify that it is complete and up to date.
Establishing conformity and signing for it
Manufacturership entails establishing that the product meets the requirements, and this is accompanied by a declaration that someone must sign. Who exactly that is and what is required for it are set out at who must sign that the product passport is correct. For a private label company, this means that someone internally bears responsibility for a declaration about a product that was designed elsewhere — a position that calls for sound agreements with the underlying manufacturer about what is supplied and when.
Keeping and maintaining data for ten years
The technical documentation and the data underlying the product passport must remain available, even after a product is no longer sold. For a company operating on private label basis, this means that the relationship with the underlying manufacturer cannot end once the last stock is sold: the data must remain accessible, which requires agreements that go beyond a one-time supply of product information.
Taking corrective measures in case of non-conformity
If a product does not meet the requirements, taking measures — such as informing customers or adapting documentation — is the responsibility of the manufacturer, in this case the brand owner. This is an obligation that does not wait for the outcome of a discussion with the underlying producer about who actually did something wrong.
Where things go wrong in practice
A common situation is that a company assumes that the underlying manufacturer, because that company designed and tested the product, also bears the ESPR obligations. As soon as the company's own brand appears on the packaging, that assumption is usually not in line with how manufacturership is structured in the ESPR.
A second situation: the technical documentation arrives at the private label company, but in a language, form or level of detail that nobody internally can use to assess whether it is correct. A declaration of conformity is signed without anyone being able to verify the underlying data.
A third: the underlying manufacturer stops producing or switches suppliers, and the data needed to maintain the product passport is lost or turns out no longer to be available. This directly affects the obligation to keep documentation available, also for a long time after the final sale — see also How long must I keep spare parts for electronics available?
A fourth situation arises when a private label company itself purchases within the EU from an intermediary, assuming that this intermediary has already met all obligations. The question of who plays which role in such a chain is addressed on I buy electronics in another EU country and resell them — and the answer is not automatically "the previous party in the chain will take care of it".
A fifth: in case of an error in the product passport, the private label company points to the underlying manufacturer as the source of the error, without having previously established who bears which liability. What can be said about this is on who is liable if there is an error in the product passport
What you can document
- A supply agreement with the underlying manufacturer which specifies which technical documentation is supplied, in what form and at what time.
- An internal procedure for who checks and signs the declaration of conformity before a private label product is placed on the market.
- An archiving agreement, both internally and with the underlying manufacturer, on where and how long the underlying data are kept.
- An agreement on what happens if the underlying manufacturer stops supplying or changes ownership, so that access to documentation is not compromised.
- A note of who within your own company is responsible for assessing reports of non-conformity and initiating corrective measures.
- For those who want more clarity about their own position in the chain: the more detailed explanation on I sell electronics under my own brand — what obligations do I get? provides an additional overview.
This is not legal advice. This page provides general information about the regulations that this platform covers. We are not familiar with your situation. If you are in doubt about your own case, consult a lawyer or the competent supervisory authority.
Written with AI based on the sources above, checked by a human on 2026-09-05. Is something not correct? Let us know — corrections take priority.