elektropas.com

What is a delegated act and why does it determine what I must do?

A delegated act specifies the ESPR for each product group

A delegated act is a legal instrument by which the European Commission implements the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) concretely for a specific product group. The ESPR itself is a framework regulation: it states that requirements can be imposed on products (in the field of sustainability, information and a digital product passport), but it does not specify which requirements apply precisely to a washing machine, a laptop or a router. That specification takes place per product group in a separate delegated act. As long as that act does not exist for a particular category, there is also no concrete obligation under the ESPR for that category. The delegated act thus literally determines what must happen, because the framework regulation intentionally left that choice to a later, specific decision.

Which products it applies to and which it does not yet

This mechanism applies to all product groups falling within the scope of the ESPR, thus potentially to a broad range of physical goods, including electrical and electronic equipment and ICT equipment. However, it applies in each case per subcategory separately: a delegated act for smartphones says nothing about the obligations for appliances, and vice versa. For a product group for which no delegated act has yet been adopted, there are no concrete requirements under the ESPR — even though that product group falls in theory within the scope of the regulation. The distinction is therefore not "does my product fall under the ESPR", but "has a delegated act already been published for my specific product group". The latter determines whether there is anything to do now, or not yet.

No fixed date yet for electrical and electronic equipment and ICT

For electrical and electronic equipment and ICT equipment, no delegated act has yet been published, and there is therefore no fixed date on which concrete obligations enter into force. What is fixed, however, is the process by which this will happen: Article 18 of the ESPR requires the Commission to draw up a work plan setting out which product groups are to be prioritised and in what order they are to be worked on. That work plan runs over the period 2025-2030. Electrical and electronic equipment and ICT are treated per subcategory in this process, not as a single whole. Until the moment when a delegated act has been published for a specific subcategory, the situation remains as it is now: no concrete information or performance requirements under the ESPR for that category, and therefore no obligation to provide a digital product passport on that basis. As soon as an act is published, it will itself state the date from which the obligations apply.

What this means in practice, step by step

The first step is to check whether a delegated act has already been adopted or is at an advanced stage of preparation for your own product category — that determines whether there is already anything concrete in motion. If that is not yet the case, there is currently no legal obligation under the ESPR for that category, but it may still be useful to consider which product data are available and structured, because a delegated act usually aligns with data that a manufacturer or importer maintains anyway. The second step, once an act has been published, is to read the act itself: it sets out per product group which performance requirements and which information requirements apply, and that is precisely what Article 8 of the ESPR obliges the delegated act to do. The third step is to check the publication date and the transition period mentioned in it, because the delegated act itself determines when the obligations take effect — this does not necessarily coincide with the date of adoption. The fourth step is to monitor: because the work plan under Article 18 extends to 2030 and runs per sub-category, the picture for electronics and ICT will change regularly, and an act that does not exist today may be published next year.

What this is based on: Articles 4, 8 and 18 of the ESPR

Article 4 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) grants the Commission the power to adopt delegated acts; this is the legal basis that allows the Commission to make such decisions without a new regulation being required each time. Article 8 of the same regulation determines what such a delegated act must substantively regulate, including the performance requirements and information requirements per product group — this is where the actual content of a digital product passport comes from. Article 18 regulates prioritisation and planning: the requirement to establish a work plan that sets out which product groups are dealt with when, with the period 2025-2030 as the framework.

What to do

For anyone already working with electronics or ICT equipment, the most concrete action is: to keep an eye on whether and when a delegated act is published for your own sub-category, and until then to put your own product data in order so that it can be easily incorporated into a passport later. As soon as an act is published for a specific category, we will publish the date and content of it directly on this platform.

What this is based on

The regulation itself is on EUR-Lex. We provide references per statement; you do not have to take our word for it.

What you must concretely do

What is expected of you

The ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) is a framework regulation. This means that the regulation itself sets out how the system works — what a digital product passport is, who must work with it, what rights and obligations apply — but not what specific requirements will apply to a washing machine, a laptop or a smartphone. Those concrete requirements come per product group in a separate document: a delegated act. Article 4 of the ESPR gives the European Commission the power to establish those acts, and Article 8 describes what such an act must contain.

For a company, this means that the ESPR itself is not yet a working instruction. It is the delegated act for the company's own product group that determines which data are mandatory, which QR format applies, and from when. As long as that act does not exist, there is also no concrete obligation to comply with.

Understanding that the regulation only works through a supplementary act

It is wise to bear in mind that "the ESPR" and "the rules for my product" are two different things. The regulation sets out the structure, but only the delegated act for the company's own subcategory makes that structure concrete. For a company with 10 to 100 employees, this means in particular that the search for "the rules" does not stop at the ESPR text itself, but continues to the delegated act that applies to the company's own products. Which products fall under it and why the division per subcategory differs is described in which products in the electronics sector fall under the ESPR and on why different rules apply for different types of equipment.

Following when the company's own product group is due

Article 18 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) governs the prioritisation and planning of delegated acts. Not all product groups are dealt with simultaneously; the Commission works with a work plan that indicates for each category when an act will be prepared. For a company, this means that there is no fixed, uniform entry date that applies to all electronics. The date on which the passport becomes mandatory depends on the delegated act for the specific subcategory. A current overview of what is known about this is provided in when the product passport becomes mandatory for electronics.

Reading the content of the company's own delegated act as soon as it is published

Article 8 of the ESPR lists the components that a delegated act must govern: the product information to be provided, the requirements for the data carrier, who may view which data, and the scope of the product group. For a company, this means that the company's own act, once published, provides answers to questions left open by the framework regulation: which data precisely must be in the passport, at what level of detail, and whether certain data are only accessible to competent authorities or also to consumers and recyclers. An initial idea of what to expect in this regard is provided in which data go into the digital product passport and on who may view which data from the product passport.

Where things go wrong in practice

One initial situation is where a company reads the ESPR as a directly applicable list of requirements and concludes that "nothing is yet mandatory", without checking whether the company's own product group already has or will have a delegated act. The regulation exists, but the concrete obligation only arises with the act.

A second situation is the reverse: a company assumes that the requirements for a similar product — for example a washing machine — automatically also apply to its own product, such as a dishwasher. Because each subcategory receives its own delegated act, that assumption is not obvious.

A third situation arises when a company waits for "the final rules" without following the planning in Article 18, and thus starts too late with organising data collection. A delegated act does not appear overnight; it is preceded by a preparation process that often provides signals about the direction early on.

A fourth situation is that an importer or manufacturer uses a delegated act for another product group as a reference framework, for example because it has already been published, and incorrectly assumes that their own act will be identical. The items that Article 8 requires are the same, but the content — which data, which thresholds, which exceptions — varies by category.

A fifth situation is uncertainty about their own position in the supply chain: a company thinks it is small enough to be excluded, while the delegated act makes no such distinction. Whether or not this is the case is described on whether the digital product passport also applies to small businesses.

What you can document

  • An overview of their own product groups and subcategories, linked to the status of the corresponding delegated act (in preparation, published, or not yet started).
  • A standing routine to periodically check the work plan from Article 18 for changes in the planning for their own category.
  • An internal contact point or person responsible for monitoring the publication of their own delegated act and translating its content into their own data collection.
  • A note of which data are already available within the company (material composition, repair data, origin of components), so that their collection does not start only when the act becomes mandatory.
  • A file containing the sources consulted when determining their own position, including the date of consultation, so that it can later be reconstructed on the basis of which information a decision was made.

This is not legal advice. This page provides general information about the regulations that this platform covers. We are not familiar with your situation. If you are in doubt about your own case, consult a lawyer or the competent supervisory authority.

Written with AI based on the sources above, checked by a human on 2026-08-22. Is something incorrect? Let us know — corrections take priority.