how do I teach my employees to work with the product passport
Employees mainly need knowledge of their own process
Preparing employees for the digital product passport mainly means helping people understand what changes in their own part of the process, not that everyone reads the entire ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781). Those who collect procurement data need to know which information will be required and where it should come from. Those who have customer contact need to know what a product passport is and what the QR code on the product refers to. Those responsible for the assortment need to know which product groups are on the agenda and when. That is three different trainings for three different roles, and that works better than one general explanation about the regulation for the whole organisation.
This is about roles within the company, not about legal training
This preparation is intended for the people who will work with the passport: procurement, product management, quality, customer service and possibly IT. It is about what they must do in practice — providing data, placing a QR code, answering questions from customers or supervisors — and not about explaining the regulation article by article. The latter is the responsibility of whoever carries the compliance responsibility, and that person needs different background information than colleagues who use the passport daily.
This is also not about whether the passport is already mandatory for a specific product. That varies by product category and by delegated act, and the training content for employees does depend on that — but you answer that question separately. More on this can be found at whether the digital product passport applies to your electronics.
There is no fixed date, but there is an order that is already known
A firm entry date for most electronics and ICT categories is not yet fixed. The delegated acts that regulate this per product group are expected according to the Commission's work plan from 2027 onwards; as soon as such an act is published, the date for that category is fixed and not before. What is already established is the way in which the Commission selects and prioritises product groups: Article 18 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) describes the criteria on which this is based, such as environmental impact and sales volume. This means that the order in which categories come up for consideration is already somewhat predictable, even though the calendar date is not yet there.
For staff preparation, that is a reason to start now with the basics — what is a passport, who does what — and add category-specific details later once they are known. Waiting until everything is fixed means waiting until there is no time left to train.
This is how you approach staff preparation
The first step is to determine which roles in the organisation will actually deal with the passport. This is usually a smaller group than expected: not everyone in the company needs to know equally much, and too much general explanation in advance often means that no one remembers what is relevant for their own task.
After that, it is useful to determine per role what specifically changes. For procurement and quality, this involves collecting and providing product data — materials, origin, repair data — for which Article 9 and Article 10 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) describe the substantive and technical requirements for the passport. For those in the supply chain, Article 38 is important: that article describes what is expected of actors in that chain when providing and passing on passport information, and that therefore also affects employees who manage suppliers or are themselves part of a chain. For customer service and sales, it is especially relevant how the passport is shown to the customer and what questions might arise about it.
A third step is to display the passport once before it is actually published, so that employees do not encounter its operation for the first time when a customer looks at it themselves. How testing works in practice is described at how you can test the passport before going live.
A fourth step, which is often skipped, is to check whether the preparation is independent of one product line or whether multiple lines are being addressed at the same time. For companies with a broad assortment, it is more efficient to set up the training around the process rather than around one product group, especially if multiple product lines at the same time fall under the new rules. This prevents the same explanation from having to be given three times separately.
Finally, it is advisable not to view staff preparation in isolation from the company's broader planning. If someone already has a timeline for implementing the passport, the training can be aligned with it instead of making it a separate project.
The basis in Articles 9, 10, 18 and 38 of the ESPR
What employees need to know follows directly from what the regulation requires of companies. Article 9 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) describes what a digital product passport is and what function it has; Article 10 describes the technical and substantive requirements that the passport must meet. Article 18 describes how and on the basis of which criteria product groups are prioritised, which forms the basis for planning per category. Article 38 describes the requirements for actors in the supply chain, which directly affects the role of procurement and supplier management within an organisation. Together, these articles form the substantive basis from which a training programme per role can be built.
Where to start
A practical first step is to map your own roles and processes using the general approach described at implementing the product passport step by step, and from there determine which employees need which information and at what time.
What this is based on
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (ESPR), article 9 (digital product passport)
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (ESPR), Article 10 (requirements for the digital product passport)
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (ESPR), Article 18 (prioritisation and scheduling)
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (ESPR), Article 38 (requirements for actors in the supply chain)
The regulation itself is on EUR-Lex. We provide references per statement; you do not have to take our word for it.
What you must concretely do
What is expected of you
The digital product passport affects not only a company's systems and data, but also the people who work with them on a daily basis: purchasers, quality staff, customer service, warehouse personnel. What exactly needs to happen is partly already laid down in the ESPR. For a company with 10 to 100 employees, this means a number of concrete points of attention.
The passport must be accessible and current
Article 9 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) stipulates that the digital product passport must be accessible via a data carrier, such as a QR code, and that the information in it must match what applies to the product at that time. For employees, this means in practice that whoever places a QR code on a product must know what is attached to it: that a passport is not a separate PDF file that is created once, but a living document that remains linked to the physical product. Someone on the shop floor who applies packaging or labels must therefore know which QR code belongs to which product variant, and what happens if the two no longer match.
The content of the passport must meet fixed requirements
Article 10 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) describes the requirements that the digital product passport must meet, including for the structure and accessibility of the data. This particularly affects the people who provide the data: quality staff, purchasers who liaise with suppliers and sub-suppliers, and sometimes also administration. They must understand which data comes from where, who within the company is responsible for keeping it up to date, and what changes if a supplier modifies a specification.
Prioritisation differs per product category
Article 18 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) governs how the European Commission prioritizes and schedules product categories for delegated acts. For the organization, this means that not every product in the assortment falls under the obligation at the same time. For employees working with multiple product lines, it is therefore important that they do not assume that "the passport" is one rule that applies equally to everything. Whoever who manages the product passport for multiple product lines at the same time needs to arrange this should ensure that employees are trained separately for each category.
Obligations apply to different actors in the supply chain
Article 38 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) describes requirements for actors in the supply chain, which means that responsibilities do not rest solely with the manufacturer, but also with importers and distributors. For a company that both imports and resells, it is important that employees in procurement and logistics know what role the company itself plays in a specific chain, and therefore what information they themselves must or must not verify or supplement.
Where things go wrong in practice
The QR code is seen as "something for the packaging department". In practice, the passport affects multiple departments: procurement provides the source data, quality checks it, logistics applies the label. If no one has an overview, a situation arises in which the code is on the box, but no one knows whether the underlying data is still current.
Customer service receives questions it cannot answer. As soon as customers or business customers scan the QR code and ask questions about its contents, this often reaches customer service. If these employees do not know what is in the passport and why, unnecessary uncertainty arises for both the customer and the employee.
New employees receive no onboarding program for the passport. In companies with staff turnover in logistics or the warehouse, the passport process is often passed on verbally. Without documented work instructions, knowledge is lost when someone leaves.
Data ownership is not assigned. When a supplier changes a specification, it is not always clear who within the company is responsible for making that change in the passport. This is especially the case in companies working with multiple suppliers and multiple product variants.
Testing before go-live is skipped. Employees who see the passport live for the first time then discover that a link does not work or that data is missing. Those who wish to prepare for this can read how to test a passport before it is published, and incorporate that as a fixed step in the internal process.
What you can document
- An overview of which department performs which step in the passport process (providing data, checking, linking to the data carrier, publishing).
- A work instruction for the warehouse or packaging department on linking the correct QR code to the correct product variant.
- A point of contact or role responsible for keeping the passport data current when a supplier changes something.
- A short internal FAQ for customer service with the most frequently asked questions about the passport, so that employees do not improvise.
- An onboarding document for new employees who will be involved in the passport process.
- A testing checklist that is run through before a passport goes live, including verification of links and data.
- A schedule setting out when which product category will be addressed, adapted to the company's own situation. For companies that still need to set this up, there is a guide on how to create a schedule for implementing the product passport.
Those who are still at the beginning and wonder where to start can also follow the steps in order through the explanation on how to implement the product passport for electronics step by step. That provides a framework within which the documents and agreements mentioned above have a logical place.
This is not legal advice. This page provides general information about the regulations that this platform covers. We are not familiar with your situation. If you are in doubt about your own case, consult a lawyer or the competent supervisory authority.
Written with AI based on the sources above, checked by a human on 2026-09-05. Is something not correct? Let us know — corrections take priority.