elektropas.com

What can I already do while the rules are not yet final?

You can start now, even without final rules

You can start without a set date and without established content for electronics and ICT. The obligation to have a digital product passport for this sector only arises once the European Commission adopts a delegated act for a specific product category, but the data such a passport will need already exists in large part within a company. If you now document what materials a product consists of, where components come from, what repair and maintenance look like, and what documentation exists, you won't have to find all that information again when the obligation does take effect.

For electronics and ICT, this does not yet apply as a requirement

This is relevant for manufacturers and importers of electronics and ICT equipment that may fall under the ESPR at some point, once their product category is included in a delegated act. This is explicitly not an obligation that already applies: there is currently no legal duty to publish a passport for electronics or ICT, to carry a QR code, or to make data publicly available. Article 18 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) provides that the Commission shall draw up a work plan and determine which product groups take priority; as long as no concrete delegated act has been adopted for electronics and ICT, this sector has no passport obligation. What may already come up, however, is that a company receives requests from customers or from its own suppliers about materials or origin — this relates to Article 38, which addresses the role of supply chain actors in making information available.

The date is not yet set, but the work plan is

When the passport obligation for electronics and ICT will take effect is not yet determined. It depends on when the Commission adopts a delegated act for this category, as provided for in Article 18. What is determined is that this article requires the Commission to draw up and periodically update a work plan that determines which product groups will be addressed first. As long as such an act does not exist for electronics and ICT, this sector has no obligation to maintain a digital product passport. It is precisely this interim period that makes preparation worthwhile: anyone who waits until the act is in place starts from scratch at that moment, whereas the data that will then be needed is often already present within the company for years, just not gathered in the right place.

Four steps that make sense now

In practice, preparation usually takes place in this order:

1. Take inventory of which products and models are placed on the market, and which of these may later fall under the ESPR as electronics or ICT equipment.

2. Gather existing data: material composition, origin of components, warranty and repair information, user manuals. This is often already somewhere, but spread across different departments or suppliers.

3. Determine what information from suppliers is needed and whether it can already be requested now. Article 38 addresses the role of supply chain actors in making this kind of data available, and part of that chain is already starting to practise this.

4. Arrange data in a structured and digital way, rather than in loose PDFs or emails. A passport requires data that is machine-readable and traceable per product; this is easier to build if the foundation is already in place.

It is also worthwhile to continue following the Commission's work plan, as it shows which product groups take priority and when electronics and ICT may be addressed.

Article 18 and Article 38 of the ESPR

This approach follows directly from two provisions of the ESPR. Article 18 (prioritisation and planning) requires the Commission to draw up a work plan setting out which product groups are to be prioritised in drawing up delegated acts; this article is the reason why there is no fixed date yet for electronics and ICT, but there is an announced roadmap. Article 38 (requirements for actors in the supply chain) describes that parties in the chain must make relevant information available; this article is the basis for the idea that data collection from suppliers can already begin now, even without the digital product passport requirement itself being active yet.

What to do

If you want to start now, start small: draw up one overview of the products that fall under electronics or ICT, and for each product note which data you already have and which are still missing. From there, it is a small step to put the same question to your own suppliers. This page will be updated as soon as the Commission publishes a delegated act for an electronics or ICT category.

What this is based on

The regulation itself is on EUR-Lex. We provide references per statement; you do not have to take our word for it.

What you must concretely do

What is expected of you

The delegated act for electronics and ICT equipment does not yet exist. This does not mean there is nothing to do — the ESPR itself already provides direction on what will come per product category, and that direction is useful for planning now.

Follow the prioritisation per product category

Article 18 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) sets out how the European Commission prioritises and schedules product categories for delegated acts. For a company with 10 to 100 employees, this means above all: following which category is due when, rather than waiting for an announcement that suddenly arrives at the door. Electronics and ICT equipment are on the schedule, divided by subcategory. Anyone who now knows which subcategory their products fall into can follow that schedule with purpose instead of having to keep up with the entire ESPR agenda.

Bring your own supply chain into order

Article 38 of the ESPR addresses the requirements for actors in the supply chain: everyone who supplies parts, materials or information that ultimately end up in the product passport takes on a role. For a mid-sized company, this means the question "which supplier supplies which data" can be answered now, even without the exact data fields being fixed. In practice, this amounts to inventorying suppliers, checking whether they can provide data on materials, origin and composition, and laying down agreements to that effect — even if for now it is still based on an assumption about what will come.

Keep track of your own product structure

Although this is not literally stated in the articles as a separate obligation, it follows from the design of the ESPR that a company must be able to indicate which product belongs to which category and which variants exist. For companies with multiple product lines, this is a separate task: not every model will necessarily receive the same passport later, and the categorisation partly determines when the obligation comes into force. Mapping this out now saves having to do it later under time pressure. An overview of how to tackle this for multiple product lines at the same time can be found in how do I arrange the product passport for all my product lines at once.

Where things go wrong in practice

Wait until the delegated act is published. Companies that only start once the text is final discover that gathering supplier data and setting up internal processes takes more time than the period between publication and when the obligation comes into force.

Have no insight into your own supply chain. Some companies do not know exactly which supplier delivers which part, let alone whether that supplier can provide data on materials or composition. This only becomes apparent when the passport actually has to be put together — too late to sort it out calmly.

Think that the passport is an IT project that is separate from the organisation. In practice, the passport touches procurement, quality, sales and sometimes customer service too. Companies that treat this as a one-off technical task run into problems as soon as employees receive questions from customers or regulators. How to divide this within the organisation is addressed in how do I teach my employees to work with the product passport.

Make no distinction between product lines. Some companies treat their entire assortment as a single entity, whereas the categorisation into subcategories can make a difference in timing and content. This leads to unnecessary work for products that are not yet due, and to delays for products that must comply quickly.

Make no preparations for inspection. Even without final rules, it can already be useful to know what a regulator normally asks for when inspecting electronics, in order to see whether your own records already align with that. See what does a regulator ask for when inspecting electronics for an idea of that.

What you can document

  • An overview of your own product categories and subcategories, linked to the schedule from Article 18 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781).
  • A supplier list with per supplier the question of whether and how they can provide data on materials, origin and composition, in line with the role that Article 38 of the ESPR assigns to supply chain actors.
  • Internal agreements on who within the company is responsible for the passport per product line — procurement, quality, or a designated coordinator.
  • A general timeline for implementation, even though the start date is not yet fixed. A guideline for this can be found in how do I plan the implementation of the product passport in my organisation.
  • A first estimate of the costs involved in the implementation, so that this does not come as a surprise once the obligation becomes concrete; see what does a digital product passport for electronics cost.
  • A step-by-step plan for your own organization, based on the general approach described in how do I approach the product passport for electronics step by step.

None of this preparatory work is mandatory as long as the delegated act has not been published. However, it is work that, once done, does not need to be repeated once the final rules are in place.

This is not legal advice. This page provides general information about the regulations that this platform covers. We are not familiar with your situation. If you are in doubt about your own case, consult a lawyer or the competent supervisory authority.

Written with AI based on the sources above, checked by a human on 2026-08-22. Is something incorrect? Let us know — corrections take priority.