elektropas.com

My supplier does not provide the data — what can I do?

Article 38 provides the hook, not the guarantee

Yes, there is a legal basis to request data from a supplier: Article 38 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) obliges actors in the supply chain to provide the information necessary to comply with the regulation's requirements, including the data for the digital product passport. This does not mean that data will automatically be provided as soon as it is requested. The regulation places the obligation on the supplier, but responsibility for the passport itself remains with the manufacturer or importer, according to Article 27 of the same regulation. In other words: Article 38 is the argument by which data can be requested, but it does not change who is held accountable if the passport ultimately does not materialise. Those who depend on a supply chain partner for critical data would therefore be well advised to make that dependency visible now — in their records and, where possible, in their procurement agreements.

For manufacturers and importers, not for every supply dispute

This topic concerns the situation in which a supplier within a product's supply chain fails to provide the technical or material data needed to compile the digital product passport. It therefore concerns information provision under the ESPR, not a general commercial dispute over late delivery, quality or product price — those are governed by ordinary contractual and civil law rules, separate from the ESPR. It also concerns specifically actors in the supply chain as defined in Article 38: parties that supply components, materials or parts to the entity placing the product on the market. A dispute with a customer, distributor or service provider outside that chain does not fall within this scope. And importantly: Article 38 operates within the framework of the ESPR as a whole — the specific data required for a product group are only set out in the delegated act for that group. Without a published delegated act for electronics and ICT, there is as yet no defined list of data that a supplier would be obliged to provide on this basis.

No fixed date yet: the work plan names 2027 as the earliest point

No delegated act for electronics and ICT equipment has yet been published. The European Commission's work plan for 2025-2030 names delegated acts for these categories from 2027 onwards, by product subcategory. As long as such an act is not in place, there are as yet no concrete obligations for electronics and ICT to provide passport data — not for the manufacturer or importer, and therefore not for their suppliers on the basis of Article 38. What is in place until then is the general framework of the regulation itself: the division of roles between manufacturer and supply chain, as described in Articles 27 and 38, is already fixed. Once the delegated act for a product subcategory has been published, its date and content will be added here.

Four steps in practice

If you are already dealing with a supplier who does not provide relevant data, it would be wise to tackle this in four steps. First: check whether your own product already falls under a published delegated act — without an act, there is no direct legal obligation based on Article 38 for that specific product group, but one is coming. Next: document your request to the supplier in writing, with a clear description of which data are needed and for what purpose. Then: include this obligation in new or renewed supply contracts and purchasing terms where possible, so that the supply does not rely solely on the regulation but is also contractually documented. Finally: keep your own responsibility as a manufacturer or importer in mind — Article 27 places that responsibility with the person placing the product on the market, so missing data from a supplier does not release that party from their own obligation. Documentation of requests made and attempts to obtain data is therefore not an unnecessary luxury, but part of demonstrating careful conduct.

The basis: Article 38 and Article 27 of the ESPR

This explanation is based on two articles from Regulation (EU) 2024/1781. Article 38 sets requirements for actors in the supply chain and thus forms the legal basis for requesting data needed to comply with the regulation — including the product passport — from a supplier. Article 27 describes the obligations of manufacturers and confirms that responsibility for the passport remains with them, regardless of where in the chain the underlying data must come from. For the exact wording and scope of both articles, the official text on EUR-Lex is the appropriate source.

If you are already dealing with this dependency, you can start by mapping which suppliers provide which data, documenting this in your own administration, and engaging with suppliers about future data provision now — well before a delegated act makes obligations concrete for your own product group.

What this is based on

The regulation itself is on EUR-Lex. We provide references per statement; you do not have to take our word for it.

What you must concretely do

What is expected of you

A manufacturer placing electronics on the market is the one who compiles the product passport and is responsible for its accuracy. This is stated in Article 27 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781). But a manufacturer rarely makes all components itself: motors, printed circuit boards, batteries, housings — these come from suppliers. Article 38 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) therefore also regulates the position of actors in the supply chain: who must provide data needed to meet the passport obligations.

The problem is that these two articles are not symmetrical. Article 27 places the responsibility for the passport on the manufacturer. Article 38 addresses the role of suppliers in the chain, but that does not change the fact that the manufacturer is the one who must deliver the passport completely and correctly — even if a supplier does not cooperate.

The manufacturer remains the point of contact

For a company with 10 to 100 employees, this concretely means that missing data from a sub-supplier is not a reason that exempts them from their own obligation. A gap in the passport remains a gap, regardless of where the cause lies. That makes the relationship with suppliers not optional: it is not just a procurement issue, it is a condition for being able to comply with the ESPR yourself.

Request data in time and accurately

The practical side of this is that a company must at some point establish which data it needs, from whom, and when. That often starts with the question which data must I request from my electronics supplier — a question that is asked sooner than expected, namely already when purchasing a new component or a new supplier, not only when the passport already has to be compiled.

Cascading to sub-contractors

With more complex products, there is another layer below the direct supplier: the sub-contractor that makes a component for that supplier. The question must my subcontractor also provide product passport data is especially relevant for companies working with multiple links in the chain. The responsibility of the manufacturer does not change as a result, but the practical distance to the source of the data becomes greater, and so does the risk that data arrives late or incomplete.

Where things go wrong in practice

A number of situations regularly occur in practice.

A supplier simply does not provide the data, without clear reason — often because their own administration is not set up for it or because no one internally has been made responsible for this delivery.

A supplier does provide data, but too late: after the date on which the passport should already have been published, or after the delivery of the product itself.

A supplier provides data that turns out to be incomplete or incorrect, and only at a later inspection does this come to light — see also how to prevent this via how do I check whether my supplier's data is correct.

A supplier changes a component or composition without notifying you, so the passport describes a situation that no longer matches the delivered product — this is especially the case when a product differs per production batch, see my product varies per batch how do I fill in the passport then.

At the conclusion of the contract, a purchaser never established that passport data is part of the delivery, so there is nothing contractual to fall back on if the data fails to arrive.

What you can document

To not be dependent on the goodwill of a supplier, it is useful to make agreements in advance and in writing, rather than discussing them only when data is already missing.

  • The purchase condition regarding data delivery. The obligation to provide passport data can become part of the purchasing contract itself, including the moment when the data must be delivered. See how do I record the delivery of passport data in my purchasing contract for the structure of this.
  • A fixed procedure for a reluctant supplier. If a supplier refuses to cooperate in adjusting the existing terms, that is a separate situation with its own approach — addressed under my supplier refuses to adjust the terms of purchase for the passport.
  • An overview of all suppliers per component. For components that can come from multiple suppliers, it is important to document which supplier belongs to which product batch or which model — see I have multiple suppliers for the same part how does that work with the passport.
  • A control moment before publication. A fixed point in the process where received data is checked for completeness and plausibility before the product passport is compiled and published.
  • A log of correspondence with the supplier. Dates of request, reminder and any receipt of data, so that it is demonstrable which steps have been taken — useful in the case of a supplier that consistently delivers late.
  • Special arrangements for imports from outside the EU. For companies that source components or complete products from outside the EU, there are additional points of attention regarding who collects and passes on which data — see what does the product passport mean if I import electronics from outside the European Union.

These documentations do not make the problem of a supplier that delivers nothing impossible, but do make it manageable: there is then a record of made agreements and steps taken, instead of a manufacturer left empty-handed when data fails to arrive.

This is not legal advice. This page provides general information about the regulations that this platform covers. We are not familiar with your situation. If you are in doubt about your own case, consult a lawyer or the competent supervisory authority.

Written with AI based on the sources above, checked by a human on 2026-08-22. Is something incorrect? Let us know — corrections take priority.